This
summer and fall I've gotten to see at least four breathtaking
concerts, all loosely linked by the fact that the primary musicians have all been women and some linked by the fact that they are
musicians I thought I would never see, or never see again. In order:
Cibo Matto, Wild Flag, the Raincoats (with openers Grass Widow, a new favorite), and St. Vincent. The ones I mainly
keep turning over in my mind, though, are just some of these, or a
handful of musicians in these, who do something that coalesces into a
singular style for me, a certain mode of attack that I only rarely
see but that softly nudges me in the gut and releases something I've
held there. It strikes me as being one way of making feminine or
feminist music, though I'm still working out what I'm sensing when I sense that.
It's
hard to know which of these to start with, but as a study in
contrasts, perhaps, let me take Wild Flag. I greeted their formation
with fangirl glee – Janet Weiss and Carrie Brownstein, returning to
me at last! And the things I knew I would love were as exhilarating
as ever: Janet's fierce precision, and Carrie in fine, athletic,
high-kicking form, she who was my biggest heroine/crush for years on
end, again in the flesh a couple of feet away from the front of the
stage where I stood in as much awe as ever. But something there had
hardened a little, I thought, into a posture; it was the idea of a
rock star that was strutting magnificently across the stage before
me. It seems to me that her voice these days is shellacked with
layers of mannerism, and the sneer is partly the sneer of the
successful. She knows she's great. She is. Determined to be all rock
'n' roll fun, and pulling it off marvelously.
And I want to talk a little about the women rockers who risk not
being all rock 'n' roll fun. Mary Timony is Wild Flag's other
frontwoman, and her presence was an interesting contrast to Carrie's.
She's every bit as adept on guitar and as fully willing a participant
in some spectacular stage acrobatics, but there's a different mood
there. I'd say a more private mood, but in fact there's no lack of
privacy in Carrie's performance, either – the bravado is a kind of
wall. It invites your body into the music, but it doesn't invite you
into communion with the musician. Mary seems to be doing something
else, daring to put her privacy and inwardness on display. Wild
Flag's a pretty upbeat group, but in her performance there's a clear
connection with the musician who fronted heavy, heavy Helium and
carried on the odd, downbeat solo career. One of my favorite songs of
hers is “I Fire Myself” from “Mountains:” a catchy, echoing piano riff
punctuated by handclaps, which, it soon becomes clear, will repeat
obsessively throughout the length of the song, working something out.
The lyrics, sung matter-of-factly, are florid in their evocation of
the trudging work that is middle of depression, or
self-doubt, or some equally internal misery:
I
fire myself ten times a day
I
fire myself in a watery grave
With
fourteen horses on top of my head
I
hear the voice again and again
The
last line is “the end of fear, the beginning of hope,” but it's
sung to the same melody and with the same inflection as the rest of
the song; she makes hope sound like a form of exhaustion, a temporary
place of rest before the climb up the next mountain begins. The
strings and guitars on the rest of the record saw away at the endless
pilgrimage of everyday life.
It
seems to me that there's a great deal of risk in this sort of thing.
No one wants to hear about someone's depression, one assumes, and
especially not if it's a woman, and especially if the cause of the
depression at hand is obscure, opaque, wholly private. But Mary
Timony's not willing to sell it or make it seem more important than
it is – and that in itself poses a kind of challenge, to assume that this stuff is worthy of attention all on its own. There
isn't any melodrama in the music, and there's no arc. Just an
emotional reality to swim into – which can be a source of
tremendous comfort and companionship if you're sawing away at a
similar emotional state.
(St.
Vincent, more upbeat and clever, is more of an obvious storyteller
than Timony, and so there's less sense of the personal being laid
bare – but she has the same love of obsessive guitar figures, often
fuzzing almost into ugliness, and stabbing lyrical refrains that make
me want to include her in this general feeling. Paint the black
hole blacker, she sings in my favorite song of hers, and she's
never afraid to let desperation creep into her angel's voice even
while she shreds on guitar. Hysterical strength, she sings on
the new album, a fitting summation.)
Then,
from out of the past, there are the Raincoats, who I also saw,
bizarrely, on their six-city reunion tour. This was a reunion I'd
never even dared to dream about, but here they were – Ana da Silva
and Gina Birch, fully and unapologetically middle-aged, not
apparently having spent the intervening years becoming any more
readily saleable or developing any “chops,” with Anne Wood on
violin as on “Looking in the Shadows” and a very young male
drummer who sensibly faded into the background.
I
got into the Raincoats because a guy who was interviewing my high
school band (an all-girl punk band called the Cautions who achieved
some level of local renown only, it's now clear, due to our novelty
and strangeness) compared us to them and later gave me a cassette
tape of their self-titled album. I carried that packet of desperate
harmony and noise in my tape player for months. It's still my
favorite, and their reunion show drew mostly from that album. There's
their exuberant, complicating cover of “Lola,” which everyone
knows if there's any song by the Raincoats everyone knows, but then
there's the rest of the album too, violin and guitar and drums and
voices all communicating with maximal intensity about the situation
of being a highly internal woman moving through the world -- being
looked at and not being looked at and loving unloved and wondering
whether she will make it through the rest of the day. The lyrics are
often hard to make out; one hears scraps of piercing demands,
obstinate and unjustified claims to our attention: Don't ask me
anything – I'm not sympathetic; Don't take it personal; Her feeling of being watched / isn't easy to define / so I won't
trouble you; I can't do a thing today.
And
none of this seems to have changed as Birch and da Silva have gotten
older; these are not the passing worries of angst-ridden youth. Their
reunion album, “Looking in the Shadows,” released at the peak of
the grunge era, was, if anything, even grimmer in content and sound,
with slower, more minimalistic guitarwork. They played some songs
from this one, too; Gina's more prominent on it, and she's a more
outgoing stage presence than Ana, who stood mostly still at the show,
small, blunt, and dressed monastically in oddly-shaped black
garments. On this album there's an extended musing about methods of
suicide, a song about a woman whose “body said no” to children
and who attempts to make a dog fill the void – and all of this is
delivered rather lightly, with the wit to see how ridiculous pain can
make us look and sound.
This
is music that figures out how to live within depression, which is
treated as personal, existential, and even political at various points. It
doesn't solve problems or assert triumphs or romanticize; it refuses to pretend that there is an easy or permanent
solution (when love is involved, there is no imploring the loved one
to notice/come back/take any action). The bold move it makes is
believing that it is worthy of being heard and that an audience will
pay attention.
And
why do I feel that this is somehow a feminist kind of music? Maybe
because the way these women formulate their rock and roll assertion
stands so distinctly against the laid-back, cool-guy mode of rock tradition, and against rock-star bravado, while still refusing to be
particularly delicate or pretty. I was almost afraid for the
Raincoats when I saw them, stout and aging and being so loudly
vulnerable. Of course, the audience, being an audience that had come
to see the Raincoats, was as reverent as I. But when I hear a woman
singing or talking about her small but heavy feelings I tense in
anticipation of some attack. There are famous men who have operated sometimes in this mode -- Lou Reed (I'm thinking especially of "Heroin"), Elliott Smith. I can't think of a woman who could have been taken seriously enough in order to reach that level of fame and critical respect while doing the same thing. Famous sad women in music have mostly operated in the modes of the lovelorn or the kick-ass angry babe; there's generally a clear explanation for their feelings, typically relationship-centered, and a clear way to resolve them, with less space to meditate and let them unfold. So even though "The Raincoats" came out in 1979, this keeps on feeling new to me.
I
don't think that this is the only way to do music or that everyone
must enjoy this way of doing music; it's not even the only way for
music to be a form of comfort. It can be as good to lose yourself in
light and warmth, and
certainly it's sometimes preferable to escape from darkness rather
than diving into someone else's rendition of it.
But:
the other week I was riding out one of the senseless waves of
depression that carries me under every so often, and I wrote a song
about it, feeling that I could do this in part because I'd seen and
heard it done. It made me feel so teenaged, putting it down so
baldly, but underneath all this was a sense of relief at having made
anything at all out of this gray heaviness upon me. I debated whether to record it, then whether to send it to the
band, worrying it would seem silly, immature, morbid, melodramatic. Not rock 'n' roll fun, not something the boys in the band
could get down to. I did record and share it, though; we're going to
play it, and it will undoubtedly feel strange to make such private
and disreputable sounds onstage. But no one, I figure, is alone in this.
No comments:
Post a Comment